How we can trust the results of studies?
Authors’ guide to handling criticism
None of our research ideas, work, or reporting are perfect, which means they are all destined to be criticized and potentially discarded.
Stanford University Names World’s Top 2% Scientists, 2020
Stanford University has recently released a list that represents the top 2 per cent of the most-cited scientists in various disciplines. The report was prepared by a team of experts led by Prof. John Ioannidis, the eminent Professor at the Stanford University. The database was created to provide updated analyses and a publicly available database … Continue reading Stanford University Names World’s Top 2% Scientists, 2020
Protected: P-value misconceptions
There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.
Protected: Critical Appraisal 3: RCT
There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.
Protected: Critical Appraisal 2: SR
There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.
Protected: Critical Appraisal 1: An Introduction
There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.
Protected: Hazard ratio
There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.
Stop Predatory Publishing
A growing number of entities are advertising themselves as "scholarly medical journals" yet do not function as such.
Clinical Research From A to Z
Our upcoming winter camp meets the increasing need for highly qualified clinicians-scientists and those participating in patient-oriented, outcomes, or implementation research. "Clinical Research From A to Z" will cover a broad array of educational opportunities to meet the diverse needs of trainees. The five modules will cover the essential of medical research from conception to … Continue reading Clinical Research From A to Z
ECEBM 